|
Queens Crystal Palace Hotel, Richmond |
|
3 Star Hotel
 
122 CHURCH ROAD
Price Starting From: £ 36.48
| Overall User Rating |
3.5 Out of 5 |
| 6 user reviews |
|
| |
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel Facilities
This hotel is ideally located for the Crystal Palace facilities (which is not just a leading competition venue for both international and domestic events but it is also a training centre for national squads, clubs and schools and a thriving local leisure facility). The hotel is located within easy reach of central London and represents very good value for money. The hotel also features 8 conference and meeting rooms catering from 6 to 600 and providing up to the minute service and facilities in an elegant atmosphere. (1107RP) It is a magnificent Victorian building with a white facade. The building was recently extended and now features a newer wing. Situated in a peaceful street, minutes from Crystal Palace railway station and within 15 minutes of central London by train (direct train to Victoria station and London Bridge). |
|
Room Types
Contains one single bed. Suitable for one person. Breakfast included.
|
|
Queens Hotel Crystal Palace Reviews, Richmond |
 |
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| Very dissapointing Hotel |
| |
Khalid |
May 06, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
The rooms are small and cramped. While the town is nice and homelly, it is too far from Central London. The cab fare from the airport was $80.00 both ways. I would never stay there again.. Never Again!!! |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| Unsatisfied |
| |
Anonymous |
Sep 12, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
The rooms need to be more clean with the changing of towels and sheets daily rather than every 3rd day. The tv was very tiny with only 3 channels. Breakfast wasnt very good it was the same every day. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| Adequate |
| |
Michael, Edmonton, AB |
Jan 01, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| lousy |
| |
john, Boston, MA |
Mar 25, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
The check-in was ok, they could not give us a smoke free room. It was far from the train so it cost us 6 pounds to get to the train by taxi, a 20 minute walk, very hilly. Then it cost 10 pounds each for a 1 hour train ride into london. The beds were lousy, the tv had 1 station. The breakfast was lousy also. i would not recommend this to anyone...... |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| My review of QUEENS |
| |
Benjamin, Philadelphia, PA |
Mar 06, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
The Queens Hotel was clean. The hotel staff were extremely friendly, courteous and helpful. It was located close to public transportation which is a must since this is the best way to get around London. It was a very good value and I would recommend it to a friend. |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Amenities: |
|
| Maintenance: |
|
| Hotel staff: |
|
| Room: |
|
| Location: |
|
| Value: |
|
|
|
| Adequate Budget Hotel |
| |
Brittany, San Francisco, CA |
Mar 21, 2007 |
| |
|
| |
The Queens in London was very clean, but behind in amenities. Staff was polite but not the friendliest. We arrived several hours before check-in, so we got what was available. The room number on door was marked with masking tape and the room seemed like it was for the help, but after asking for a upgrade we were quikly given a bigger , better room at no extra cost. The breakfast left alot to be desired, so I would not rely on it. On a good note, the location was great. About 20 minutes outside d |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City In Map |
|
|
|
|
